>>39463No, it's not. Stop being a 4/g/eet/. The fundamentals are the exact same between monitors and TVs, and the only meaningful difference is in possible framerates and a bit in motion processing, which TVs do better all around because they sacrifice latency for it (but enabling game mode basically turns them into big monitors because game mode is actually good in most TVs now). TVs also don't support over 144hz right now. You can in fact make an educated decision on monitors by looking at TVs, they're all way closer than people want to admit.
t. Has an HDR OLED Phone, a 2,000 zone 2,000 nit miniLED VA TV, and a 165hz 1440p IPS monitor with a terrible 700:1 contrast ratio and obviously fake HDR that looks worse when you enable it. And did basic research this way.
I have it all and the biggest difference by miles is between the IPS monitor and the miniLED TV. In fact my phone only looks meaningfully better than my TV in mostly pitch dark HDR scenes with very small highlights when all the lights in the room are off. OLED jitter is admittedly mostly bad when trying to read light text on a black background. Ironically, OLED is at it best where it's also at its worst.
Not trying to sound upset with you personally, but it's really hard for me because display discussion pisses me off so much. I['ve seen too many boomers buy an OLED TV for news broadcasts instead of infrequent home theater use, and too many people blame miniLED because they bought a low tier one for a pitch black home theater 4 years ago. Then there are the hardware/monitors unboxed and LTT, and other techtuber fanboys who aren't even real people in my eyes.