Update 2026-09-28:New! Check out the Flash Archive!
Update 2026-09-25: Over 80k posts from the Internet Archive spanning 2021-2023, including full-size images, have been imported.
Update 2026-09-24: Search with AI: Type a natural search query to find relevant images. Click 'Similar' on any file to find visually similar images.
Update 2026-09-24: Over 2.3 million posts from the Kolyma-era Log Warehouse have been imported into the archive.
The scientific method will never yield the theory of everything. The scientific method is based on observation. That means that the nature of unobservable universe, which cannot be observed, is out of the reach of science. Just because something is true of the observable universe, does not mean that it must be true of the unobservable universe, or the entire universe. To say that it does, would be a fallacy. It's called the fallacy of composition. Take the expansion of the observable universe for example, if it is true of the observable universe it doesn't mean you can judge whether or not it's true of the unobservable universe using the scientific method. If it was not true of the unobservable universe, then it would not be a property inherent in the nature of gravity. So, in order to have a theory of everything which shows the fundamental laws governing the nature of the entire universe, both observable and unobservable, science and the scientic method which it is based upon must be shelved as a non-satisfactory method to accomplish that goal. The only way to discover a theory of everything for the whole universe is not through science and physics, but through something which is not reliant on observation: logical truth. That's why all the particle physicists and cosmologists who work to look for a fundamental theory of everything do so in vain, as they cannot say their observations are true of the unobservable universe since they can't observe it, and also they mightn't be even able to observe the universe at the smallest possible length if it is smaller than anything attainable by humans, or if there is no smallest possible lenght, and everything is always divisible, they wouldn't be able to do it in either case. And to assume that the smallest observed lenght is the smallest possible length in the universe is naive.
Theres this scene from the Inuyashiki manga/anime, where a character that was being bullied by 2chan starts to kill the sites users through the display.
Thenk Ju JUESEJ Ju ar maj best frend Ju ar dhë pis kipër Ju ar dhë lëxhend
Thenk Ju JUESEJ stoping xhenosajd helping smol Kosova stoping dhë rong fajt In najnti-nanjti-najn helping in Kosova Tu men sheking hends Klinton end Rugova
Thenk Ju JUESEJ Ju ar maj best frend Ju ar dhë pis kipër Ju ar dhë lëxhend
Dhis vork dhat vi du dhë vej vi thenk ju dhis song dhat vi sing memoris vil bring In so meni kauntris ju ar kiping pis ju ar dhë lajf sevër ju ar pejn rilis
Thenk Ju JUESEJ Ju ar maj best frend Ju ar dhë pis kipër Ju ar dhë lëxhend
