>>39218Hmm... interesting. You certainly proved it wasn't an accepted thing back then. I assumed it was uncommon, but I didn't know it was considered so abnormal back then.
I still stand by my point of view, but I agree that specific example from the picture was a bit extreme I guess.
A more reasonable minimum age for marriage would be 11 or 12.
For a functional society, women's education (outside the instruction she receives from her husband) should be prevented at all costs.