[94 / 12 / 1]
Don't believe me? Try this experiment: get into an argument with a furry, disparage the furries, then say this: "Protogen".
Like clockwork, he will then call you a furry, perhaps using some rhetorical query such as "how do you know what a protogen is if you aren't a furry"
Sometimes, it is not even required to use components of their dialect in order to elicit a "closet furry" accusation. Even just disparaging them will sometimes trigger them to call you one of them.
Now you may wonder: Why does Wise Sage know what a protogen is
Your answer, a furry cringe compilation.
I have a theory about how furries are controlled by an extraterrestrial intelligence and that the entities they call "protogens" are some type of borg entity, but that's not the main topic of this schizopost yet.
Furries use "you're one of us" as a smear or simply to irritate or, if they repeat it enough to someone who isn't resilient against it, to assimilate.
For having read this, you are a furry according to that logic. I know that is patently false, even if you may be thinking "sage is a furry", you do not consider yourself one. Neither do I, but the furries have psyop'd you into thinking that anyone who knows about furry BS through whatever osmosis is also a furry.
If you are Americans, the majority of you have probably watched disney shit and soyfaced over it. Congratulations, furries want to assimilate you, they will now attempt to call you a furry for having liked disney. (Well, if you still like it you're more likely to be but it doesn't automatically mark you as one, it just marks you as a manifestation of the soyjak archetype)
But according to Furry Secret Society "anyone who knows is now one of us" smear logic, the majority of Americans are furries. If you count this in the "number of furries" statistic, that looks very optimistic for the furries on their numbers, does it not?
So to recap, according to fur-tard debate logic
Disparaging furries = closet furry
Having even a minuscule modicum of information pertaining to furries, even by means of "some furry wouldn't get off my damn board and kept spamming fur-coal" = closet furry
watching disney shit, etc, at some point = furry
Now obviously, this isn't true.
Furfags smear you by accusing you of being one of them, by attempting to assimilate you.
How fortunate for the illuminati that the furries exist.
The furries could be fed NWO disclosure (NWO has to call its shots through sci-fi or through some other fictional means, part of their superstition) and be used as a proxy by the NWO to disclose NWO ops in plain sight, no more do they have to rely on Stargate, Star Trek, or other sci-fi that doesn't immediately make you a target for ridicule for having seen it.
Now they can hide their disclosure amongst furry BS and anyone who calls it out is surely a furry for even knowing of it.
The solution is not normalizing furryism, which is the brainlet way. The solution is to apply discernment and therefore know who is a furry and who is not. For example, my level of opposition to furries, my writing style, my trolling of them, that indicates that I am not one of them.
As for the protogen theory, they're part of the ETs behind the furry cabal.
There's a reason for all the Spyro memes and it's likely beyond the comprehension of the low-level furry shills who attack me as to why these memes are being made.
If you really want to know what's powering the black cube:
11 protons. English, Klingon. -[{ium }, {Sop}] [{i}, {op}]→[{ie}, {awp}]
Stelter archetype.
Remember that HD 203280 is still a main-sequence star, therefore Spyro cannot be "reignited".
How can a star that has never departed the sky "return"?
Like clockwork, he will then call you a furry, perhaps using some rhetorical query such as "how do you know what a protogen is if you aren't a furry"
Sometimes, it is not even required to use components of their dialect in order to elicit a "closet furry" accusation. Even just disparaging them will sometimes trigger them to call you one of them.
Now you may wonder: Why does Wise Sage know what a protogen is
Your answer, a furry cringe compilation.
I have a theory about how furries are controlled by an extraterrestrial intelligence and that the entities they call "protogens" are some type of borg entity, but that's not the main topic of this schizopost yet.
Furries use "you're one of us" as a smear or simply to irritate or, if they repeat it enough to someone who isn't resilient against it, to assimilate.
For having read this, you are a furry according to that logic. I know that is patently false, even if you may be thinking "sage is a furry", you do not consider yourself one. Neither do I, but the furries have psyop'd you into thinking that anyone who knows about furry BS through whatever osmosis is also a furry.
If you are Americans, the majority of you have probably watched disney shit and soyfaced over it. Congratulations, furries want to assimilate you, they will now attempt to call you a furry for having liked disney. (Well, if you still like it you're more likely to be but it doesn't automatically mark you as one, it just marks you as a manifestation of the soyjak archetype)
But according to Furry Secret Society "anyone who knows is now one of us" smear logic, the majority of Americans are furries. If you count this in the "number of furries" statistic, that looks very optimistic for the furries on their numbers, does it not?
So to recap, according to fur-tard debate logic
Disparaging furries = closet furry
Having even a minuscule modicum of information pertaining to furries, even by means of "some furry wouldn't get off my damn board and kept spamming fur-coal" = closet furry
watching disney shit, etc, at some point = furry
Now obviously, this isn't true.
Furfags smear you by accusing you of being one of them, by attempting to assimilate you.
How fortunate for the illuminati that the furries exist.
The furries could be fed NWO disclosure (NWO has to call its shots through sci-fi or through some other fictional means, part of their superstition) and be used as a proxy by the NWO to disclose NWO ops in plain sight, no more do they have to rely on Stargate, Star Trek, or other sci-fi that doesn't immediately make you a target for ridicule for having seen it.
Now they can hide their disclosure amongst furry BS and anyone who calls it out is surely a furry for even knowing of it.
The solution is not normalizing furryism, which is the brainlet way. The solution is to apply discernment and therefore know who is a furry and who is not. For example, my level of opposition to furries, my writing style, my trolling of them, that indicates that I am not one of them.
As for the protogen theory, they're part of the ETs behind the furry cabal.
There's a reason for all the Spyro memes and it's likely beyond the comprehension of the low-level furry shills who attack me as to why these memes are being made.
If you really want to know what's powering the black cube:
11 protons. English, Klingon. -[{ium }, {Sop}] [{i}, {op}]→[{ie}, {awp}]
Stelter archetype.
Remember that HD 203280 is still a main-sequence star, therefore Spyro cannot be "reignited".
How can a star that has never departed the sky "return"?
