yknow what, this shit just got christpilled time to derail the thread and destroy you with acutal EVIDENCE
You're conflating completely different subjects and presenting accusations as historical facts.
First, where is your historical evidence that Jesus sexually abused children? There is no known ancient historical source establishing that Jesus engaged in sexual activity with children. Mark 10:13–16 actually depicts Jesus welcoming and blessing children, and Matthew 18:6 contains a severe warning against harming little ones. You have provided no evidence whatsoever for your accusation.
Second, you're bringing up divine judgment in the Old Testament. Yes, the Old Testament contains accounts of children dying in divine judgments, including the Flood and the Egyptian firstborn. But these are ancient religious narratives, and their historical details are not automatically established by the existence of the texts. The Exodus and the conquest narratives have substantial archaeological problems. See the work on Exodus archaeology and the archaeological research on Jericho.
Third, you're misrepresenting the discussion of biblical slavery and sexual legislation. The Old Testament does regulate slavery, including foreign slavery, and contains passages concerning captive women. I'm not denying that. Deuteronomy 21:10–14 is particularly controversial. Biblical scholar Caryn A. Reeder even published a peer-reviewed article arguing that this legislation enshrines wartime rape. But that is an entirely separate discussion from whether Jesus personally committed sexual abuse.
Fourth, saying all Abrahamic prophets were pedophiles is an unsupported generalization. You need individual historical evidence for each person you're accusing.
And finally, you're confusing divine judgment with sexual misconduct. Even if you reject the theological justification for a particular Old Testament judgment, that does not establish that Jesus was a child rapist.
I'm perfectly willing to discuss difficult biblical passages and historical scholarship. What I'm not willing to do is accept an extraordinary historical accusation without evidence.
Produce an actual historical source establishing that Jesus sexually abused children. Not an unrelated Old Testament passage, not an apocryphal text with an invented interpretation, and not an insult. Actual evidence.
>>18987624>>18987618>>18987594
Ghost replies have been enabled on all boards. /meta/ has been added for meta discussion.