>>18825918i'm so glad you asked, but the answer is realistically likely not
due to the americanification of trying to shove egyptian phonetics and their associated pictographic counterparts into a system that we can butcher, if we tried to communicate with them they would be gegging and calling all of us ESL before throwing stones for being foreigners without trade
even calling it tutjak is kind of like saying "trumpjak" since tut ruled long after the establishment of the 'glyph, but surface level knowledge of egyptology is that tut was this big glorious nigga who did it all, when in reality he was an inbred soylent monstrosity with a bunch of diseases before dying at 18 and ruling since childhood
SNCA rambling aside, if you wanna say tutjak properly? it would be kind of like a layered pun, as a jak is the transformation of a person into a jak, so…the glyph on its own is kind of destined to be something complicated, like it's better off just being said as the head facing forward glyph, or maybe two of them next to eachother? i swear there's a way of saying this all better but this isn't something anyone has ever really discussed before until now, bare with me it's all very autistic i know