>>18774015>if Mao Zedong stayed he would be greatDuring Mao Zedong's reign, every single year the economy got worse and worse. The 70s which was the time he died left inevitable damage and China was one of the poorest countries in the world, poorer than even some african shitholes
During 1978, the whole country was so fucked they immediately needed to end the communist-maoist policies that made China poor to begin with
Also, Mao Zedong did implement equal working rights for women, end China's oppression by the Japanese, and unified China and stopped and ended internal conflict in China and stopped foreign powers from dominating China.
But how did he exactly make China become rich? China didn't become a global superpower until the 90s-2000s. Which was after Deng Xiaoping abolished communism and implemented the state capitalist policies of China.
>If Mao Zedong stayed he would be greatIf Mao Zedong stayed he would implement another shitty policy and China will never recover and it would keep being an impoverished shithole.
>he ended starvations, china always had this problem but he fixed it once and for all. How? Need some explanation. He was the one that caused the starvations bro…
>He learned from his mistakesNo? China still had his severely flawed economy and it wouldn't stop until 1978, which was 2 years after Mao Zedong stopped being in power. (AKA: He died at the age of 82)
>when one person rules whole country some bad things are inevitable, and the overall direction was really goodI mean the early years of his reign were good but once he implemented the Great Land Reform movement that's when shit started going downhill.
And he was definitely an immoral person, I don't think there's debate about that.
Mao Zedong might've been better than Stalin but he really isn't that far off in terms of moral corruption.