Quoted By:
>>The uke is a woman
>Moe boy ukes have been steadily declining in popularity over the last fifteen years, for starters. That aside, it's tranny logic to call a feminine, neotenous dude with a dick and balls a woman. Moe ukes probably got popular in the first place because they allow the reader to alternate between voyeurism and self-insertion (which I'm willing to admit happens, it just isn't universal the way anons argue it is.)
>>What about A/B/O, CB, and mpreg
>Actual data from Ao3 was posted in an earlier thread proving that these fetishes are niche, they just get outsized attention because they're weird and fun to ridicule. The people who like this stuff are very surface-level in their enjoyment of yaoi in that it's just about two dicks. Anecdotally, these fetishes seem to be an offramp into het romance. CB in particular is motivated by the veneration of penetrative sex clashing with the reader's disgust toward anal; they want two hot "guys," and they want penetration, but they don't want butt stuff.
>>You fetishize gay men just like men fetishize lesbians
>Not really an argument anons here make, but I'll tackle it anyway. Women and gay men both share one marginalized trait, and women do not pose a material threat to gay men in real life. Straight men are not marginalized at all, and they fetishize lesbians, who are twice marginalized; they are a known, tangible threat to lesbians in real life, in part because the porn they watch sends the message that lesbians can be "turned" and that lesbian intimacy is a display for men, just foreplay leading up to straight sex. 44% of lesbians have been sexually assaulted, and 90% of those assaults had male perpetrators.
>>You don't portray gay men realistically
>Romance fiction by women for women, straight or gay, does not portray ANY kind of man realistically, because men fucking suck in real life. If somebody fails to understand that this characterization is fictional wish fulfillment, that's an issue with them being mentally ill.
>>Fujos are "brethren" with lolicons
>Association fallacy.
>>Some fujos are shotacons, supported an anti-censorship bill >in Japan, post Epstein memes, or are faghags who cape for gay men
>Composition fallacy.
>>Fujos act like enjoying BL is feminism activism
>The women who enjoy yuri and CGDCT are just as likely to do the same thing. Manga is not activism, everyone who makes this argument is a retard regardless of what genre they consoom.
>>Fujoshi "lesbians" are not lesbians, why do fujos think they are
>Belief in "lesbian" fujoshis is not a popular opinion on Lolcow. At best, they are febfems low on the Kinsey scale. Most of the people who believe this are libfem retards who also believe in "comphet" and "C4T lesbians," so their opinions are meaningless.
>Notice how most of these anti-fujo arguments are just moral pretexts to engage in intrasexual heckling. They recognize that mistreating other women instead of addressing men or larger systems clashes with their "feminist" identity, so they cook up post-hoc "feminist" justifications to alleviate the cognitive dissonance. It is weaponizing the rhetoric of social justice against other women who enjoy something they dislike simply as a matter of taste.
>>inb4 "I'm not reading all that shit."
>An admission that you do not stand by your own ideas when pressed.
