Archives: [soy / date / pol / r9k / incel / qa / tech / q / raid / a / int / x / r / v / mtv / mickey / news / asp / an / biz / bait / bunker / caca / chive / fit / fnac / g / gem / giga5 / hobby / jak / jiren / ohio / plier / ptb / sci / shrk / sneed / ss / sude / tv / yyyyyyy / b / bant / fap / giga / health / muv / nate / qst / soya / suggest / webm]
Update 2026-09-28: New! Check out the Flash Flash Archive!
Update 2026-09-25: Over 80k posts from the Internet Archive spanning 2021-2023, including full-size images, have been imported.
Update 2026-09-24: Search with AI: Type a natural search query to find relevant images. Click 'Similar' on any file to find visually similar images.
Update 2026-09-24: Over 2.3 million posts from the Kolyma-era Log Warehouse have been imported into the archive.
[14 / 3 / 1]

The normies' genetics cult theorem

No.83893 View View Original Report
I noticed that despite real self-improvement actually being possible in every field of human capability in the modern world, you still have normies shilling it and shaming you if you do it. I distinct the real self improvement, the kind that is enough to change your destiny, such as iqmaxxing or looksmaxxing, from ineffiecient things like gymmaxxing or outright cope such as "be confident bro". Whenever you bring up things that actually change your destiny, an npc nigger swarm mobilizes to either tell you that it doesnt work despite mountains of evidence in favor of said self improvement method or ouright shame and call you names if the efficiency of a certain method cant be denied. A good example is a looksmaxxer called Androgenic. If this guy just popped into youtube in the form he is now, normies would be meatriding him to death, but since he showed his journey and showed that he actually changed his destiny, he is radioactive to normies. Anyone who denies the role that they were given by genetics is automatically a blasphemer in the eyes of the normies. This goes both ways: if someone naturally good at math abandons this field and goes on to create music, for example, he would be called out and encouraged to do the thing he's supposed to do, while someone not naturally good at math will be clowned on if he tries hard and denies his destiny, and if he makes it and matches the level of those who had a headstart in this field, normies will say that they actually encouraged him all along and deflect critisism using his example.
What are your thoughts on this?