Archives: [soy / date / pol / r9k / incel / qa / tech / q / raid / a / int / x / r / v / mtv / mickey / news / asp / an / biz / bait / bunker / caca / chive / fit / fnac / g / gem / giga5 / hobby / jak / jiren / ohio / plier / ptb / sci / shrk / sneed / ss / sude / tv / yyyyyyy / b / bant / fap / giga / health / muv / nate / qst / soya / suggest / webm]
Update 2026-09-28: New! Check out the Flash Flash Archive!
Update 2026-09-25: Over 80k posts from the Internet Archive spanning 2021-2023, including full-size images, have been imported.
Update 2026-09-24: Search with AI: Type a natural search query to find relevant images. Click 'Similar' on any file to find visually similar images.
Update 2026-09-24: Over 2.3 million posts from the Kolyma-era Log Warehouse have been imported into the archive.
[2 / 2 / 1]

st. paul le GOOD?

No.83580 View View Original Report
i've been looking into the bible after having a bout of skepticism towards the second half of the new testament, mainly centered around paul. i understand it is understood that he saw Jesus in a vision on his trip to damascus with a few unnamed witnesses to the event which caused him to renounce judaisim and embrace Christianity. while i would like to take him at his word, i find issue with the fact that the testimony of these witnesses isn't included in the bible and we have to rely on paul's word alone. i'm wondering if any of the Christians on this board can give an explanation for why his account is taken as seriously as the other apostles