>>84991>TL;DR, pick your poision. modded wafu you can only see and feel client side, or a server side girlfriend everyone can agree is real. one will love you without question, the other could love you beyond reason. what is more valuable to you? the experience of love, or the shared vulnerability that facilitates it?Is messing with the bicameral mind worth it if all you end up doing is busting a nut?
At least schizos have Jesus in their hearts. This is some mega advanced loosh demon parasitism.
<This reminds me of how Jung talks about the anima: basically, deep down inside, you're a bitch. Or you have some ideal of a bitch (mostly based off your mom because you're a little oedipal freakdiddy)
For jung then individuation is integrating or overcoming your anima, maybe you become less manly then you wanted to, but you were never going to be a REAL man anyways, so you might as well make peace with that ho inside.
Tulpamancy is the exact opposite of that. It is entering into a "relationship" with your anima, which, jung likes to point out, is way stronger than you. Not only have you made it thus impossible for yourself to ever individuate, you have become a manservant to your subconscious mind.
<>the advantages of a real girl are numerous im sure, although to be honest im having a hard time thinking of some. i guess you can fuck them for real, though if you get good at lucid dreaming/hallucination you can experience sex with your tulpa (or anything really) in a realistic or even hyper realistic way. Case in point: this man has degenerated into a freak. His anima has taken control of him and the demon is looshing off his sexual energy or vril. His soul is empty. He's having a hard time thinking of things. I'm sure he's having a hard time thinking at all.
<So why is it dangerous? Consider that schizophrenia isn't plain insanity, but like julian jaynes proposed the conscious mind acting on its own.
Unlike the unconscious it has a hard time keeping track of things or seeing the bigger picture, but by and large, the schizophrenic operates logically, but without any context.
This is why a schizophrenic will see a person smile and think that man is out to kill him: the conscious mind is not aware of the context or why the man may smile at him, so it looks for reasons not by examining the social context itself but the man in front of him. Gold chain. Tatoos. A gang member? Crack teeth.
Because the conscious mind focuses in on specifics the picture it produces is an exaggerated reality. What might register as 'crack teeth' might be a single chipped dent etc.
<You actually need your subconscious to do these things for you and segregating it into a corner of your mind IS demonic, in fact.
Anima-possesion if you will.
<Maybe you dont need a woman to love you.
<Woaaah nooo my hollywood movieeeeeeess!!! I want le perfect pretty foid…Maybe, even if you're chad, women won't love you. Fun as chad may be, he's just another guy, just a fun ride. A fun time, a pretty face and nothing more.
There are more than enough chads to go around, and its never really love that brings chad and stacy together, is it?
What if its all an illusion? What if, in the past, men were men and women were women not out of love, or passion, or for each other, but out of duty.
Maybe being manly was your duty as a man, and being loyal was the duty of a woman, and men and women started families out of duty, duty to the community or to their parents in turn.
Maybe there was a big chain linking all people together from the little brother to his sister to their parents and all the ancestors in the past.
Maybe we feel a nostalgia for that time, to have that again even if only at smaller scale, with just one person.
But in doing so we feel something they never did, to them it WAS the way dirt is, or the moon, or the stars, and maybe our ancestors never really felt anything like love.
But now we've gained a lack of something that never existed, maybe.
