Update 2026-09-28: New! Check out the 
Flash Archive!
Update 2026-09-25: Over 80k posts from the Internet Archive spanning 2021-2023, including full-size images, have been imported.
Update 2026-09-24: Search with AI: Type a natural search query to find relevant images. Click 'Similar' on any file to find visually similar images.
Update 2026-09-24: Over 2.3 million posts from the Kolyma-era Log Warehouse have been imported into the archive.
Flash Archive!
Update 2026-09-25: Over 80k posts from the Internet Archive spanning 2021-2023, including full-size images, have been imported.
Update 2026-09-24: Search with AI: Type a natural search query to find relevant images. Click 'Similar' on any file to find visually similar images.
Update 2026-09-24: Over 2.3 million posts from the Kolyma-era Log Warehouse have been imported into the archive.
Threads by latest replies - Page 742
furchuddy.png
How come 'morifags can get away with a shota porn thread but 'teens will freak out over wholesome furry art?
ClipboardImage.png
Surviving the /qa/ coaltalogue - Day 20
I'm impressed with the level of discussion and detail in these Hiro-approved meta threads. In the end, I’d say it’s given me an insight into the real issues being discussed. So thanks to all the people who have taken part.
After reading some of the responses to my suggestions, and after a lengthy formal peer review, it's become clear that there's no easy solution. The ideas I put forth may seem to make sense on paper, but, as has been pointed out, in practice they can become cumbersome and the cost could mount up. What struck me is the general lack of a willingness to discuss any other ways of achieving the same things. The point is to get people to talk and think about new ideas.
In an ideal world, people would also be willing to talk about ideas that are no so good - like /tech/ and /incel/ ( ev&doe there's an awful lot of support for those boards). In reality, I don't expect that many people will be able to get into detailed discussions about ideas that aren't fully fleshed out, or even be honest about what’s going to work and what isn't.
I would like the discussion to remain as focused as possible on the key issues that people actually have in mind when they visit a /qa/ thread.
I'm impressed with the level of discussion and detail in these Hiro-approved meta threads. In the end, I’d say it’s given me an insight into the real issues being discussed. So thanks to all the people who have taken part.
After reading some of the responses to my suggestions, and after a lengthy formal peer review, it's become clear that there's no easy solution. The ideas I put forth may seem to make sense on paper, but, as has been pointed out, in practice they can become cumbersome and the cost could mount up. What struck me is the general lack of a willingness to discuss any other ways of achieving the same things. The point is to get people to talk and think about new ideas.
In an ideal world, people would also be willing to talk about ideas that are no so good - like /tech/ and /incel/ ( ev&doe there's an awful lot of support for those boards). In reality, I don't expect that many people will be able to get into detailed discussions about ideas that aren't fully fleshed out, or even be honest about what’s going to work and what isn't.
I would like the discussion to remain as focused as possible on the key issues that people actually have in mind when they visit a /qa/ thread.
1681772122611.jpg
Total Zellig Death
ClipboardImage.png
PIYO-157
1680169968798-0.gif
442oons board although
FILENOTFOUND.png
POST REDACTED
ClipboardImage.png
"Occhi the rock
1680738921792870.jpg
7979060f442bb9c893122e78c9afa64a.jpg
1150840.gif
>Oh....oh my, Klebold-sama! It's so big and cut and juicy! Fuck I need your big Jewish cock in me NOW!
<sorry bitch, it's for white women only. fuck off you stupid chink.
>WAAAAAHHHHH
<sorry bitch, it's for white women only. fuck off you stupid chink.
>WAAAAAHHHHH
dd13e883e3aeaff162fcce08fd6e35cd.jpeg
Quoted By:
>>88308
would you?
