>>121505tsmt
to be perfectly frank it's way too freaking late in the game to implement a rating system, especially one where the default value is "safe" instead of "unrated"
we are 42,000 'jaks in at this point, if you think people are going to go and tag each and every single one as "safe" "questionable" or "explicit", accurately, when there are no guidelines for what should be in each category, you are absolutely delusional
plus we already have the functionality to search for or filter out nsfw content. it's called the "nsfw" tag. instead of making a whole new system from the ground up, we should just prioritize correctly tagging things as nsfw or not
blogpost over
