Archives: [soy / date / pol / r9k / incel / qa / tech / q / raid / a / int / x / r / v / mtv / mickey / news / asp / an / biz / bait / bunker / caca / chive / fit / fnac / g / gem / giga5 / hobby / jak / jiren / ohio / plier / ptb / sci / shrk / sneed / ss / sude / tv / yyyyyyy / b / bant / fap / giga / health / muv / nate / qst / soya / suggest / webm]
Update 2026-09-28: New! Check out the Flash Flash Archive!
Update 2026-09-25: Over 80k posts from the Internet Archive spanning 2021-2023, including full-size images, have been imported.
Update 2026-09-24: Search with AI: Type a natural search query to find relevant images. Click 'Similar' on any file to find visually similar images.
Update 2026-09-24: Over 2.3 million posts from the Kolyma-era Log Warehouse have been imported into the archive.
[13 / 2 / 6]

No.4308631 View View Original Report
What are /pol/'s thoughts on IQ tests as a metric of quantifying intelligence? How trustworthy do you believe them to be in assessing someone's cognitive ability and potential outcomes in life? If the scores on the tests administered to the captured Nazi officials during the Nuremberg trials (picrel) and the claim of JFK having an IQ of 119 happen to be accurate, it would imply that someone only has to be better at matching patterns than around 80-90% of the population to potentially become politically successful, which I find interesting.