Quoted By:
White "women" are distinguished by more masculine traits. They have square jaw, angular facial features, prominent brow ridges, more developed mastoid processes, combined with a more robust skeleton. They are also taller, larger, more odorous (unlike Asian women with the ABCC11 gene) and their voices are often louder and more resonant, contrasting with the softness and delicacy of Asian women (average fundamental frequency around 220-250 Hz for asian women vs 180-210 Hz for white "women"). They are closer to African "women" than we think. Their behavior is not the cause of some hook nosed Abrahamic entity, but just the reflection of their neandertal biology. There were already writings in books by European travelers from previous centuries contrasting the masculinity of European "women" with that of East Asian women.
When a white "women" tries to imitate this ethereal cuteness, it just doesn't work, like a man wearing a wig, its cringe,as their genetics predispose them otherwise. Their bodies were simply not designed for this role. . At core they remain slightly modified versions of the male model, with female reproductive organs grafted on by evolutionary accident .Even surgical alterations can do little to change the underlying biology, leaving them as little more than modified men. unironically, the phrase "YWNBAW" could just as easily apply to white "women" whose traits deviate significantly from the feminine ideal. So this trait infuriates Neanderthal Orcs (roasties), who equate outrageously these Asian angels with children to criminalize their nature that they cannot imitate (cope tactic). I'm using white "women" as an example but it applies to all non Asian women. Why don't you see any difference between white "women" and trannies these days? Because sexual dysmorphism between white "women" and men is almost non existent.
Flash Archive!
