/pol/ - International /Pol/itics & /Bant/er » Thread #4288827

[20 / 1 / 12]

106KiB, 500x572, ClipboardImage.png

Chud ID:kLeYPC0b Sat 31 Oct 2026 18:22:05 No.4288827

View View Original Report

Quoted By: >>4288931

north africa is sicilian

Chud ID:Tx0SC3sJ Sat 31 Oct 2026 18:25:26 No.4288870

Report

Quoted By: >>4288922

sicily is african *

Chud ID:xYgmRvcG Sat 31 Oct 2026 18:32:45 No.4288922

Report

>>4288870
meds king Roger deported all africans to Tunis

Chud ID:Wa^utE8N Sat 31 Oct 2026 18:34:51 No.4288931

Report

>>4288827
Sicily was colonized by greeks and carthaginians, but it is Roman.

Chud ID:AsJYYaOu Sat 31 Oct 2026 18:35:26 No.4288946

Report

Monarchism will never win btw

Dr Cumskin ID:NzyAjqey Sat 31 Oct 2026 21:38:49 No.4289755

Report

I think the worst fucking nigger I have ever dealt with in my life was tunisian

Chud ID:!Ue1bLMM Sat 31 Oct 2026 21:44:20 No.4289767

Report

Quoted By: >>4289887 >>4289969

It was the other way around. South of Rome is predominantly an Italo-Arabic type, north of Rome is predominantly of Nordisch, i.e of Germanic, blood (https://www.theapricity.com/earlson/history/italy.htm). Karl Earlson is cool.

Chud ID:k1!uxjiX Sat 31 Oct 2026 22:20:43 No.4289887

Report

Quoted By: >>4289907 >>4290137

>>4289767

No, Northern Italy is genetically the most similar to Southern France and Iberia (yes, even Andalusia). Southern Italy has a bit more MENA-like influence which makes them plot closer to Albania and Greece. They're still white, but they're as near eastern a white can get. Their relative decadence and backwardness makes them look non-white coded, plus Italian immigration in the US, contrasted heavily with the predominantly NW European Anglosaxon and German stock in appearence and culture, which made them even more non-white coded than they already are. The Irish were also pretty backwards and brutish but at least they looked quite undistinct from the English, thus they don't carry the same stigma.

Chud ID:!Ue1bLMM Sat 31 Oct 2026 22:26:31 No.4289907

Report

Quoted By: >>4289917

>>4289887
Could I get a source for that? I'm intrigued.

Chud ID:k1!uxjiX Sat 31 Oct 2026 22:29:36 No.4289917

Report

Quoted By: >>4289947

>>4289907
I don't have le serious scientific sources but this is more easy to read: https://kossina.substack.com/p/a-song-of-polenta-and-pizza-the-north

Chud ID:!Ue1bLMM Sat 31 Oct 2026 22:38:35 No.4289947

Report

Quoted By: >>4289998

>>4289917
I tend not to trust scientific journals anyway. If Lewontin can get published, anyone can. I suppose I should edit my statement regarding Northern Italians; Germanic admixture is certainly present, the Patrician class was certainly of mostly Germanic racial elements and the studies of Sieglin certainly point towards a pronounced Germanic element common amongst most of the great men of the region and Suetonius, for example, described several emperors of being golden-blonde with blue eyes. So perhaps the northern masses do not possess this blood, but the greatest men of the region certainly did.

Chud ID:Y5epKB4m Sat 31 Oct 2026 22:47:45 No.4289969

Report

Quoted By: >>4289988

>>4289767
North Italy has historically been Celtic just like southern germany France austria and northern iberia
roman latin influence came earlier and germanic influence came later and it is very minor (like idk 1-10 20%?)

Chud ID:!Ue1bLMM Sat 31 Oct 2026 22:52:34 No.4289988

Report

>>4289969
Read my other reply or the article, the two are complementary.

Chud ID:k1!uxjiX Sat 31 Oct 2026 22:54:10 No.4289998

Report

Quoted By: >>4290118

>>4289947

A lot of Roman Emperors had light traits but i don't think they looked stereotypically Nordic. Some may have looked half way between an Spaniard and a German basically. They must've definetely looked Atlantid or Mediterranean, with some Alpine influences. I'm not very fond of Nordicism because it doesn't make a very logical argument despite being a supposedly materialistic theory of history. It presumes the Nordic component it's instrumental to civilizational advancement and the sole responsable component to it. And yet, if we take the theory to it's ultimate conclussion, it seems that Nordics only prospered in small numbers ruling over native populations but never became actually relevant in their own original point (i.e. Northern Europe) until the Middle Ages.

Also, light traits aren't super indicative of genotype. Europe has been selecting for light traits for thousands of years. The CWC peoples had similar proportions of light and dark traits to modern day Italy but they were the progenitors of those "Nordic" peoples you mentioned (Germanic, Italic, Celtic, etc). The Yamnaya (which aren't the actual source of Germanics) were also relatively swarthy, although not to say they were brown (brown isn't a race anyway).

Mikoon X ID:ypyr4Nmg Sat 31 Oct 2026 22:57:04 No.4290006

Report

Quoted By: >>4290026

Whites historically raped by literal nafri inbreds lol
At least that gave Italians chad genes which is why they are commonly rated as the most attractive men in europe due to their darker features

Chud ID:k1!uxjiX Sat 31 Oct 2026 23:00:34 No.4290026

Report

>>4290006

Aren't Italians notoriously short compared to Germanics? Maybe incels were wrond about height

Chud ID:!Ue1bLMM Sat 31 Oct 2026 23:19:47 No.4290118

Report

>>4289998
According to Carleton Coon, the Keltic Nordids migrated out of Southwestern Germany into Northern Italy during a period of Celtic migration. What I don't understand is the continued denial of their provably Germanic features and factors as affirmed by Gunther (1927), His (1866, a Swiss anthropologis), Rochat, who stated that the Roman type was essentially Nordic, Sieglin, who in 1935 verified the phenotypic-Germanic origins of the name Flavi and Rufti (Blonde hair, Red hair, includes their derivatives), the name Caeser meaning blue-eyed, derivatives, Plutarch and Suetonius describing several emperors precisely as blonde and with blue eyes (such as Nero and Augustus), so on so forth. The typological/etymological evidence is generally enough to concur that the Roman type was essentially Nordic. Also, the notion that the Scandinavians and Germanics were not relevant in their urheimat of Northern Europe until the Middle Ages simply is not true. Note, for example, Arminius, the Nordic Bronze Age (in which an ability to utilize complex artistic and technical processes the Mediterranean world could not match, as seen with the Trundholm Chariot), the Amber Road, and the Volkerwanderung. Rome had to establish a massive defensive network to halt Saxon raids.

Chud ID:tG5Wjl7e Sat 31 Oct 2026 23:24:42 No.4290130

Report

Quoted By: >>4290139

india = civilzation builder
mayopig italy = civilization stealer 🤣

Chud ID:vKIrRAY2 Sat 31 Oct 2026 23:27:12 No.4290137

Report

>>4289887
yeah this
i think i checked at some point its like 10% or more levantine dna

Chud ID:vKIrRAY2 Sat 31 Oct 2026 23:27:32 No.4290139

Report

>>4290130
haha
it stopped being funny a long time ago

Capcode	All Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Embed Type	All Only With YouTube Only With Vocaroos Only With Sounds Only With Flashes
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Locked Threads Only Looped Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Data Source	All From archived.st From Log Warehouse From Internet Archive
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Favorites	All Only My Favorites
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First AI Most Relevant First

On these boards

Your latest searches