>>4266728I mean according to lynn and becker, you should have an Iq of arounf 75, which on it's own is implausible
>>4266738>All these samples scored extremely low, both in terms of globalrelations and to the geographical neighbourhood. At first there was
a suspicion that not all sets of Raven's Matrices were used, but this
was not stated in the sources. Indeed, Jamison and Moock (1984,
Table 2) reported a range of scores which corresponded to the full
CPM and these gave results which are not much different to the
results from the other measurements in Nepal. Eventually, the rural
origin of all samples may explain the results but an urban sample
for comparison was not available.
The unweighted national IQ of Nepal is 42.79, which is very
implausible, but the standard deviation across the different studies
is only 4.10. The score also remained stable after weightings at
42.99. Data to calculate a SAS-IQ were not available, thus we can
neither obtain confirmation nor rejection of the psychometric IQ.
Even if all used samples are from rural areas we would expect a national IQ for Nepal not so far below the national IQ of its neighbourhood country India (76.24).
https://www.ulsterinstitute.org/ebook/THE%20INTELLIGENCE%20OF%20NATIONS%20-%20Richard%20Lynn,%20David%20Becker.pdf