>>4237206>What's considered truly necessary isn't a static variableIt is a relative variable, wether it changes or remains the same varies solely on who you are asking, for the purposes of corporatism the state is what decides what is truly necessary as it is the highest authority in the economic field, as to WHAT the state feels is necessary obviously varies, but if we are talking about fascist corporatism specifically - then it is whatever benefits the nation the most.
>Firm choices in market economyOptions 1 and 2 are considerably riskier than option 3, especially to a firm already suffering from labour shortages, the profit motive moves in the path of least resistance.
>The corporates have no incentive for innovationThis is hardly the case, the corporates may not be led into innovation by market competition but for a similar reason, the competition of nations, which, if anything, brings about innovation far quicker and with much more pressure, it is simply taking the inherent Darwinian logic of progress and applying it in a larger scale, such technological advancements quickly become downstream into civilian technology, this is actually a very common origin for many inventions in history.
>Real wages either stagnated or fellStagnation is a rather erroneous use here, the wages were stabilized, you must understand that before Nazi Germany it was the Weimar Republic, hyperinflation AND the great depression made worker wages during that period extremely inconsistent - if anything, it is a miracle that Nazi Germany was able to stabilize the worker wages and at least keep them consistent throughout it's existence, Fascist Italy exemplified best that corporatism is most effective under the pressure of war, everything economically leading up to WW2 in economics was, simply put, preparation for it, such as moving away from agriculture to industrialization.
>Slave labourMore cost effective than killing them, all things considered.
>Policy of conscription and rearmament Of course, war depletes factory workers, Fascist Italy understood this and it is why they were so adamant on bringing the rural men to work in factories, it is to offset this issue, also less factory workers means less competition for those who remain which ultimately means better wages for the factory workers under the stress of war, war really is the binding which keeps the fascist economy running.
>State might not be correctBy correct I think you mean "fit", as that is really the only universal term I will accept, and by what I said, an unfit fascist state dies, as any unfit state should.
>Slavish devotion to the state and visceral contempt for all it's dissentersGiggle chat.
>There are no checks or balances to powerThere always exists a check to power and that is nature, handle your power inadequately and you'll die early with a terrible legacy, handle it with competence and you'll be revered for generations to come, all other "power checks" or "balances" are artificially built by man and suffer the same easily corruptible incentives that drive man, give it enough time before any and all things made by man are corrupted, yes, even the state, but the latter is prone to destruction assuming there are more powerful states willing to conquer it, I believe every society works in cycles of ascension and collapse, you can't keep something infinitely improving by the very laws of entropy.
>Free speech goodNo, like I've explained, man is inherently corruptible, allowing rethoric to run freely is dangerous to social cohesion and stability.
>Trust and voluntary cooperationTruth, even if it was held as the most important thing by a society, will always be lacking under capitalism, there is none saying that a company shouldn't hide malpractices or what have you
>BoycottThis assumes it would even be found to begin with, and I don't see a world where dog whistling becomes a profitable thing - let alone how terrible breaches of privacy would be IF it was profitable, you cannot go snooping to see if a company makes use of child labour because that would be an invasion of their property/privacy, you can only make baseless claims as far as they are concerned, all you're doing here is give incentives to the liars and parasites of the world to simply step up their game.
>Brooo goyim are actually human or something you're just blackpillingYou cannot be saying this while looking at the amount of people addicted to porn, nicotine, drugs or booze, these are not people willing to sacrifice their comfort for moral upstanding, in fact it's the
OPPOSITE, kill goyim.
Flash Archive!
