/pol/ - International /Pol/itics & /Bant/er » Thread #4225116

[5 / 1 / 4]

845KiB, 1344x1973, 1791226766705q.png

Chud ID:z9lQKSst Sun 18 Oct 2026 18:09:16 No.4225116

Socialist rebellion in the imperial periphery is pointless, as no third world country (alone or not) can ever hope to stand as equals with the capital-aligned first world and the combined military and economic might it represents. For the global war against capitalism to succeed and therefore for it to give way to true communism, the Revolution must effectively be a swift and total strike in the imperial core.

Merit Maniac ID:!IJ4rIXY Sun 18 Oct 2026 18:13:24 No.4225177

Report

Quoted By: >>4225257

What does strike mean? Revolution? that's what Marx thought would happen anyway.

Chud ID:eGUicjcG Sun 18 Oct 2026 18:20:42 No.4225257

Report

Quoted By: >>4225327 >>4225344

>>4225177
It doesn't really matter what shape the "strike" takes in practice as long as it achieves the objective of eliminating any significant opposition to the revolutionary project.
Though of course the most realistic option is violent overthrowal and the implantation of a dictatorship of the proletariat.

Colorjak Sun 18 Oct 2026 18:28:45 No.4225327 Report

>>4225257
>violent overthrowal
Seems impossible considering the only effective means of actualising this would probably involve some sort of insider military coup/revolt, and, as far as I know, the (revolutionary) left has no sway over any first world military. For however many guns there are per capita in WeimariKKKa, and in spite of how many people call for the epsteinbludderinos to be executed or put on trial, there's very little political violence directed at the ruling class, and unfortunately I think things are going to continue this way for a while longer

Merit Maniac ID:!IJ4rIXY Sun 18 Oct 2026 18:30:24 No.4225344

Report

>>4225257
>as long as it achieves the objective of eliminating any significant opposition to the revolutionary project.
If you don't mean revolution, as Marx thought, let's just imagine the first world (America most importantly, but also Let's just say all of Europe) was to vanish, i don't think this fixes the larger point that there just isn't a "global war against capitalism". And that those opposed to the "revolutionary project" would still be their respective governemnts and national bourgeoisie.
>the most realistic option is violent overthrowal and the implantation of a dictatorship of the proletariat.
Is it the most realistic? It's the imperial core precisely that has proved most averse to proletarian revolutions

Capcode	All Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Embed Type	All Only With YouTube Only With Vocaroos Only With Sounds Only With Flashes
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Locked Threads Only Looped Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Data Source	All From archived.st From Log Warehouse From Internet Archive
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Favorites	All Only My Favorites
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First AI Most Relevant First

On these boards

Your latest searches