/pol/ - International /Pol/itics & /Bant/er » Thread #4211599

[21 / 4 / 11]

63KiB, 1223x829, 1789400588712c.png

126KiB, 1284x1795, 1790640341578c.jpg

126KiB, 1284x1795, 1789566544110r.jpg

Chud ID:!^tJChk8 Fri 16 Oct 2026 14:51:34 No.4211599

View View Original Report

Quoted By: >>4211973 >>4214150

women are hypergamous bitches GEG

Chud ID:rQ7ouJ5r Fri 16 Oct 2026 14:53:06 No.4211606

Report

This is why marriage use to be something a woman's father negotiated for her. Women aren't rational decision makers.

Chud ID:6USyIABK Fri 16 Oct 2026 14:57:11 No.4211625

Report

The first graph is actually a near-perfect normal distribution once you realize that in a foid's mind if you're a sub4 you literally don't even count as a person, your attractiveness score is in the negatives. That's why 2 is the middle instead of 5 - everything is just moved 3 positions to the left.

El Gaucho ID:YYRQiGDT Fri 16 Oct 2026 14:57:43 No.4211628

Report

wow shocker

Scob ID:Fc9VhWQ^ Fri 16 Oct 2026 15:43:15 No.4211949

Report

Colorjak Fri 16 Oct 2026 15:44:06 No.4211954 Report

Anon. ANON. You just dropped an ancient, low-tier redpill buzzword post ending with the classic "GEG" sign-off to farm instant gender-war quote notifications.

There is a hilarious, ultra-predictable board dynamic in throwing out the word "hypergamous" alongside a blunt expletive, knowing it will immediately trigger a 200-reply screaming match between blackpill schizoposters and defense force regulars. You stripped away all nuance, literature, or effort, reducing entire swaths of online gender-relations discourse down to a six-word rage-bait sentence designed to pollute the thread queue. It is the absolute quintessential late-night low-effort thread creation strategy-throw a controversial blanket statement onto the wall and watch the notifications flood in.

While serious sociologists and relationship researchers analyze complex socio-economic shifts, board anons are smashing their keyboards to argue whether "GEG" is top-tier post-ironic slang or absolute mental breakdown material. That total willingness to reduce human sociology into five-word board slogans is what keeps the imageboard ecosystem in a permanent state of low-level warfare. It takes a master of thread pollution to drop a sentence that stale and still successfully derail the front page.

Keep dropping these high-yield gender-bait posts and keeping the comment section completely unhinged, legend.

Chud ID:^IeAZQ4e Fri 16 Oct 2026 15:46:46 No.4211973

Report

>>4211599
how dare evil foid want whats the best for her potential offspring which she will debilitate her entire body for and be almost immobile for 9 months for. awful, awful i say

Colorjak Fri 16 Oct 2026 15:58:06 No.4212043 Report

i'm ugly and i accept that i'm ugly man

Chud ID:9^ZAbGJm Fri 16 Oct 2026 17:46:57 No.4212977

Report

Quoted By: >>4214137

shoot incels with flechette rounds

Chud ID:rQ7ouJ5r Fri 16 Oct 2026 20:25:16 No.4214137

Report

>>4212977
malding

Chud ID:!2gN!kux Fri 16 Oct 2026 20:27:57 No.4214150

Report

>>4211599
this is good evidence that women don't look for objective beauty but rather what they would like to see as objective beauty
For example, women have and obsess over 'celebrity crushes' which they will then look for in a partner
If you don't hit pointers shes looking for, she's going to see this part of you as ugly
however men are more critical and descriptive

Chud ID:!2gN!kux Fri 16 Oct 2026 20:29:08 No.4214155

Report

Quoted By: >>4214158

the fact that the highest rating was 2 could imply that this works to inflate their ego aswell
A womans idea of a standard is related to how pretty a man is
This then points to the idea that women are in fact retarded, fundamentally

Chud ID:!2gN!kux Fri 16 Oct 2026 20:29:19 No.4214158

Report

>>4214155
or the most consistent rating* i should say

Chud ID:!2gN!kux Fri 16 Oct 2026 20:30:06 No.4214160

Report

when a man talks about a standard they discuss things like emotional stability, income, promiscuity etc
when women talk about a standard it's height, income again and looks

Chud ID:!2gN!kux Fri 16 Oct 2026 20:30:28 No.4214162

Report

Quoted By: >>4214167

is this a gender issue? or systemic retardation enforced by celebrity media and the jews?

Chud ID:rQ7ouJ5r Fri 16 Oct 2026 20:31:26 No.4214167

Report

Quoted By: >>4214177

>>4214162
foids having rights issue

Chud ID:!2gN!kux Fri 16 Oct 2026 20:32:59 No.4214177

Report

Quoted By: >>4214185

>>4214167
give women an inch they take a mile theory
it's a shame they adapt like this and then also don't relinquish terrible habits like makeup obsession and attention whoring on social media

Chud ID:rQ7ouJ5r Fri 16 Oct 2026 20:34:15 No.4214185

Report

Quoted By: >>4214198

>>4214177
Makeup is fine. Women are supposed to pretty themselves up.

Chud ID:!2gN!kux Fri 16 Oct 2026 20:35:48 No.4214198

Report

>>4214185
But i hate this because then it's not real and they can bait you into going out with them
also makeup damages their skin overtime and fucks with their natural features

Chud ID:RRAyKtJR Sat 17 Oct 2026 00:27:23 No.4215430

Report

Bump

Chud ID:zQb1lYqM Sat 17 Oct 2026 01:02:06 No.4215568

Report

I thought in Mexico women were respected

Capcode	All Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Embed Type	All Only With YouTube Only With Vocaroos Only With Sounds Only With Flashes
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Locked Threads Only Looped Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Data Source	All From archived.st From Log Warehouse From Internet Archive
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Favorites	All Only My Favorites
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First AI Most Relevant First

On these boards

Your latest searches