[4 / 3 / 4]
Quoted By:
>>4195963
>The head of the state inclines the slaves toward certain virtues, >toward a particular type of personal character;
>And disinclines them toward doing what the head of the state >percieves as bad.
>there are two fundamental types of society based upon these >two ways. There is
>the material way of living, with individuals striving for, or >pursuing,
>"happiness" through artifical means of consumption in >excessive dopamine spiking materials, material comfort and >wealth. Then there is the way of
>excellence, of idealism (or nobility) with individuals striving for an idealistic
goal.
>The system in itself has systematized surveillance and the >effiminate men who're cooperative in their own societal >libertinage.
>Throughout history, moral gangrene has always been >civilizations greatest mode of production.
>And The slave is the upholder of the tradition, the slave is the >one who follows the systems ideal ways of living, and has >similiar thinking to said system
>therefore the slave must die too, otherwise the mass >manufacturing of slaves will always persist.
>There is not a single parasitic lifeform on this planet who truly >deserves to live, we are nothing but beasts in nature, yet we >deny our true selves.
>Those who're stifled by the matrix of illusions - of "good" and >"evil" are already far too gone and therefore deserve to die aswell.
>We as humans must cause destruction as a byproduct of our >existence, and this reason alone is applicable to every other >living lifeform.
>And as a result of these findings I must come to conclude that >all life itself is parasitic, and there is no such thing as >innocence, as it is to me an illogical concept.
>Why would u care if a retarded child were to die in the most >"gruesome" way possible? The child being unaware or lacking >understanding of the surroundings around him somehow
>makes him "innocent" ? No it does not, do not confuse >innocence with ignorance, because that is exactly what it is. >Humans and all of life itself are only capable of causing >destruction to the natural world
>and perpetually depriving it of its resources. whilst they >slaughter and eat the flesh of another being simply for the >preference of its taste, whilst they cause biotic and abiotic >byproducts in agriculture that cause
>several degradation to the environment and surrounding >ecosystems all to manufacture more and more parasitics, they >somehow come to profess around the quality of "good" which >is an impossible standard for all life to meet
>Which is why I say No Lives Matter.
>This post was a response to commenters on youtube >explaining why a man killed civilians instead of higher-ups, and >here is my explanation on why it's arguable that within their own frameworks of logic that the civilians must die too.
>And disinclines them toward doing what the head of the state >percieves as bad.
>there are two fundamental types of society based upon these >two ways. There is
>the material way of living, with individuals striving for, or >pursuing,
>"happiness" through artifical means of consumption in >excessive dopamine spiking materials, material comfort and >wealth. Then there is the way of
>excellence, of idealism (or nobility) with individuals striving for an idealistic
goal.
>The system in itself has systematized surveillance and the >effiminate men who're cooperative in their own societal >libertinage.
>Throughout history, moral gangrene has always been >civilizations greatest mode of production.
>And The slave is the upholder of the tradition, the slave is the >one who follows the systems ideal ways of living, and has >similiar thinking to said system
>therefore the slave must die too, otherwise the mass >manufacturing of slaves will always persist.
>There is not a single parasitic lifeform on this planet who truly >deserves to live, we are nothing but beasts in nature, yet we >deny our true selves.
>Those who're stifled by the matrix of illusions - of "good" and >"evil" are already far too gone and therefore deserve to die aswell.
>We as humans must cause destruction as a byproduct of our >existence, and this reason alone is applicable to every other >living lifeform.
>And as a result of these findings I must come to conclude that >all life itself is parasitic, and there is no such thing as >innocence, as it is to me an illogical concept.
>Why would u care if a retarded child were to die in the most >"gruesome" way possible? The child being unaware or lacking >understanding of the surroundings around him somehow
>makes him "innocent" ? No it does not, do not confuse >innocence with ignorance, because that is exactly what it is. >Humans and all of life itself are only capable of causing >destruction to the natural world
>and perpetually depriving it of its resources. whilst they >slaughter and eat the flesh of another being simply for the >preference of its taste, whilst they cause biotic and abiotic >byproducts in agriculture that cause
>several degradation to the environment and surrounding >ecosystems all to manufacture more and more parasitics, they >somehow come to profess around the quality of "good" which >is an impossible standard for all life to meet
>Which is why I say No Lives Matter.
>This post was a response to commenters on youtube >explaining why a man killed civilians instead of higher-ups, and >here is my explanation on why it's arguable that within their own frameworks of logic that the civilians must die too.
