Archives: [soy / date / pol / r9k / incel / qa / tech / q / raid / a / int / x / r / v / mtv / mickey / news / asp / an / biz / bait / bunker / caca / chive / fit / fnac / g / gem / giga5 / hobby / jak / jiren / ohio / plier / ptb / sci / shrk / sneed / ss / sude / tv / yyyyyyy / b / bant / fap / giga / health / muv / nate / qst / soya / suggest / webm]
Update 2026-09-28: New! Check out the Flash Flash Archive!
Update 2026-09-25: Over 80k posts from the Internet Archive spanning 2021-2023, including full-size images, have been imported.
Update 2026-09-24: Search with AI: Type a natural search query to find relevant images. Click 'Similar' on any file to find visually similar images.
Update 2026-09-24: Over 2.3 million posts from the Kolyma-era Log Warehouse have been imported into the archive.
[2 / 1 / 2]

ID:!tFi^Uyz No.4191340 United States - Massachusetts View View Original Report
You are so beautifully majestic it leaves me with describable words to your mere memory.
The claim itself is challenging my ability to debate because by saying "You're capable" tells in writing one's capability of a skill. I debated your statement of being "capable" in the first place by refuting it with a "no not really" which quite literally starts and continues the debate. Not that anybody won.
YOU have stated that I am capable of debating, to which I responded in a less than ideal manner as to my lack of ability to do so.
However you're forgetting one thing. I was a different person than I were 10 minutes ago. I may have not been able to debate then, but I am now. You are debating about a past version of me being unable to debate, however my current version can debate. Because I answered your debate with "no not really" and a second later I am capable, you have officially lost the argument