>>4190485I apologize for the accusation then, I saw an edit here
>>4189690 and thought you are part of that group.
If you morally support them, I really don't understand why.
First of all these are literally attacks that gain 0 benefit, and no popularity outside the Internet whatsoever (here I'm not really arguing why it's le bad, I'm just saying it's a fail. picrel)
Second, death is something no one can comprehend, so why gift it to others, if you don't want it yourself? It doesn't erase your responsibility, even after you die (even if you want to die).
As I said, the shootings never achieved a greater good, only more and more outrage.
You think it's "not unreasonable" until you realize this; There is no point in doing that to other groups, when the other group can say the same thing about you, and do the same thing back to you because of what you intend to do. Also, if every person was likeminded (the agenda of which you are currently pushing by posting "tuff edits", making people seem like they're doing good by killing people) would it be a better world? Everybody wanting to shoot each other, because of an incident that happened between the groups of both pairs, completely unrelated to each other? Tell me, why would this agenda be pushed, knowing that your kid, or even yourself one day, could literally be in the middle of a shooting because some wh*Tey wanted to "save muh wyt race n sheit".
What good are you fighting for, if what you are doing is damaging the good?
Idolizing shooters is just wrong man, sympathize what's good instead. If you want to fix a cause you think is wrong, shooting a few people then yourself is not it. (Even if u dont shoot urself nusoi u understand what i mean)