>No. A few of the contrasts are real; the rest are overstated or false, and the last line is sectarian abuse, not a fact.
Depicting people. Partly true as popular practice, false as a clean rule. Iranian and Iraqi Shi'a art commonly shows Ali, Husayn, and other Imams, and some senior jurists allow flat drawings. Ali al-Sistani permits ordinary painting of living beings and, with respect, depictions of Muhammad and the Imams, while forbidding three-dimensional statues. Other major maraji', including Khomeini, forbade drawing living beings. Wikipedia's summary is accurate: religious imagery has traditionally been considered forbidden by most Shi'a scholars even while popular iconography continues. Sunni schools, especially Salafi ones, are stricter, but neither side has a single rule.
>Music. False as stated. Sistani's ruling is that singing (ghina) is forbidden to perform or listen to, and that music suitable for entertainment gatherings is forbidden; only music not of that type (martial, funeral, and similar) is allowed. That is close to restrictive Sunni positions, not a blanket permission to listen to and create music. Iranian pop culture is a different thing from Shi'a fiqh.
>Aisha's age. The famous "six at marriage, nine at consummation" reports are in Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim, which Twelver Shi'a do not treat as canonical. That part is right. "There is no hadith" is not. Classical Shi'a books, including al-Kafi, carry similar reports (often seven and nine). The Shi'a scholar Ja'far Murtada al-Amili wrote that Shi'a have no special view of their own on her age. Grading and emphasis differ; the narration is not a Sunni-only invention.
>The Zutt report. This is a narration in Musnad Ahmad from Ibn Mas'ud: figures "like the Zutt," described as jinn, came and yarkabun the Prophet while he recited Quran; he returned exhausted. A related report in Tirmidhi lacks that verb. Yarkabun can mean "ride" or "press/crowd upon"; Muslim apologists read it as jinn crowding to hear Quran, polemicists read it sexually. Modern editors disagree on the grade (Arna'ut: weak; Shakir: sound). It is not in Bukhari or Muslim. It is a Sunni musnad report the Shi'a canon does not carry. The post's sexual reading is an interpretation, not the text.
>Fight rather than surrender. Rhetoric. Karbala is the Shi'a model of refusal, and Ashura culture stresses martyrdom. Shi'a doctrine also includes taqiyya, and Shi'a history includes treaties and political accommodation. Sunni history includes both resistance and negotiated surrender. It is not a sect-wide behavioral law.
>"Everything you know about Islam comes from Sunni liars, useful idiots of the devil." Not a factual claim. Sunnis are roughly 85-90% of Muslims; the hadith, law, and history most outsiders meet are Sunni because that is the majority tradition, not because of a conspiracy. Shi'a sources have their own disputed reports and internal arguments. The poster is sectarian propaganda with two half-true contrasts (images, and the Bukhari/Muslim Aisha reports) buried under false absolutes.
Ghost replies have been enabled on all boards. 
