Reminder that being opposed to adult-child sex is philosophically indefensible without adopting sexual puritanism (which won't happen on a societal scale outside of /pol/ fantasy): https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/40441324

"Child sexual abuse" is an empirically invalid pseudoscience. There is no link between participation in adult-child sex and psychological harm. In the late 1990s there was a massive media shitstorm caused when the researcher Bruce Rind released a meta analysis debunking child sexual abuse pseudoscience, the results of the study caused so much butthurt, the study was officially condemned by United States congress, which was unprecedented. https://www.newgon.net/wiki/Rind_et_al

"Victims" of child sexual abuse were consenting partners in a sexual relationship, and the majority report their experiences as positive. Data going back to Kinsey shows children involved in pedophile relationships react no more negatively than adults in age correspondent relationships. Child sex causing trauma is a myth.

Adult-child sex was common historically, and in other cultures: http://www.sexarchive.info/GESUND/ARCHIV/GUS/GUS_MAIN_INDEX.HTM

"Grooming" is literally just the courtship process.

Child pornography laws are unconstitutional and used to justify state abuse. The average Amerimutt supports banning pixels, and will cheer on decades long imprisonment for persons charged with possessing those pixels. Reminder that child pornography was legal and freely available in the US until the late 1970s.

The overwhelming majority of child rapists are teleiophilic.

The average man is strongly sexually attracted to pubescent girls.

The teen brain being inferior is a myth, the adolescent brain is fully developed between 12 and 14.

Age of consent laws are linked with decreased birthrates.

Pedophile and child emancipation will happen during the early 21st century whether chuds want it or not, the hysteria is coming to an end.