Quoted By:
>>4302477
Probably one of the most soy-ish thumbnails I've encountered
Let's break down and debunk every anti-soylita "argument" (cope)
>Muh pedophilia!
Well lets see what so heckin' pedophilic about her
>Muh pedophile usage!
Because bad actors use something doesn't make this something is a bad thing
Pedophiles and failtrolls use Rapeson, Cobson, Wholesomejak, Babyjak, Soytan and Sproketan to self insert their pedophilia
Does it makes those variants pedophilic? No of course not
>Muh lolipop in her hands refers to loli!
No, lollipops and similar candies in the hands of children like characters are common things to emphasize their age
Just like that hat with a propeller or jeans with tights
>Muh map flag colors!
Most retarted argument ever
First of all. MAP flag goes from blue at the top to pink at the bottom
Soylita colors are reversed and goes from blue at the bottom to pink at the top
Second of all. Lolipop in her hands breaks this retarted argument completely because it has more than seven diffirent colors which are not on the MAP flag
>Muh pedophilic origin
Another retarted argument by nusois who can't read
Post with her ((((origin)))) dates on december 30
Original Soylita image come from December 26
Post with that art was art of Soylita because Soylita existed before this post
Just go to the gallery of her 'ki page and you will ser proto-soylita variants that existed long before that art
>Muh name refers to lolita!
And? During that time (2021 /qa/ era) pretty much every little girl character were called "loli" just because of heckin' anime specific of 4chan
It's just a good name that It highlights what the author of the 'lita wanted to do.
The children's like NAS which existed because at that time there were no option to represent a children in 'toss
That's literally all. There's nothing pedophilic about Soylita expect her reputation
But Salt will still ban her and then allow real pedophiles walk around via gigaquoting because it's "ironic"
#JUSTICE4LITA
>Inb4 spam
