Archives: [soy / date / pol / r9k / incel / qa / tech / q / raid / a / int / x / r / v / mtv / mickey / news / asp / an / biz / bait / bunker / caca / chive / fit / fnac / g / gem / giga5 / hobby / jak / jiren / ohio / plier / ptb / sci / shrk / sneed / ss / sude / tv / yyyyyyy / b / bant / fap / giga / health / muv / nate / qst / soya / suggest / webm]
Update 2026-09-28: New! Check out the Flash Flash Archive!
Update 2026-09-25: Over 80k posts from the Internet Archive spanning 2021-2023, including full-size images, have been imported.
Update 2026-09-24: Search with AI: Type a natural search query to find relevant images. Click 'Similar' on any file to find visually similar images.
Update 2026-09-24: Over 2.3 million posts from the Kolyma-era Log Warehouse have been imported into the archive.
[2 / 1 / 1]

/sci/ post

No.5346 View View Original Report
Thought of something, I would consider this similar to Malthusianism if it was more modern and applicable and not gay and stupid. Basically in the future the amount of energy we produce from one plant will have an average or a set amount. For every new power plant the only change in our output will be linear as we are just increasing the value of x while the amount of energy produced is the slope. The amount of energy we need to traverse solar systems, then galaxies, then clusters, etc. is exponential, and eventually the simply linearity of our energy production will limit our progress, so we need to figure out how to make our energy output exponentially increase for every new plant built to combat the challenges of traveling deep space. Just as in malthusianism the population growth was exponential but the resource gathering was linear, but human ingenuity made this not an issue any more, so we can do it with this too(maybe)